| # | Team | P | W | D | L | Goals | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7:2 | +5 | 6 | |
| 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4:0 | +4 | 3 | |
| 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3:0 | +3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4:2 | +2 | 3 | |
| 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3:1 | +2 | 3 | |
| 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2:0 | +2 | 3 | |
| 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2:0 | +2 | 3 | |
| 8 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3:2 | +1 | 3 | |
| 9 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3:2 | +1 | 3 | |
| 10 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2:1 | +1 | 3 | |
| 11 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2:1 | +1 | 3 | |
| 12 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2:1 | +1 | 3 | |
| 13 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1:0 | +1 | 3 | |
| 14 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1:0 | +1 | 3 | |
| 15 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1:1 | 0 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1:1 | 0 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1:1 | 0 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1:1 | 0 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1:1 | 0 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1:1 | 0 | 1 | |
| 21 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1:1 | 0 | 1 | |
| 22 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2:6 | -4 | 1 | |
| 23 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2:3 | -1 | 0 | |
| 24 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2:3 | -1 | 0 | |
| 25 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1:2 | -1 | 0 | |
| 26 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1:2 | -1 | 0 | |
| 27 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1:2 | -1 | 0 | |
| 28 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1:2 | -1 | 0 | |
| 29 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0:1 | -1 | 0 | |
| 30 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0:1 | -1 | 0 | |
| 31 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2:4 | -2 | 0 | |
| 32 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1:3 | -2 | 0 | |
| 33 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0:2 | -2 | 0 | |
| 34 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0:2 | -2 | 0 | |
| 35 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0:3 | -3 | 0 | |
| 36 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0:4 | -4 | 0 |
Gent vs AGF Aarhus prediction for the UEFA Conference League match on Oct 15, 2026, at 17:45. Based on the latest odds and team form, Gent are the clear favorites with a 50% win probability, while AGF Aarhus have an 18% chance of an upset.
Gent come into this match in excellent shape. Their last five results show four wins and one draw (W-W-D-W-W). In those matches, they scored nine goals and conceded only two. Highlights include a 2-0 away win at Zulte-Waregem on Oct 10 and a 3-0 victory at Cercle Brugge on Sep 6. The only dropped points came in a 1-1 draw at Genk on Sep 13. Gent are unbeaten in five and look solid at both ends.
AGF Aarhus have also been strong recently, with three wins, one draw, and one loss in their last five (W-W-D-W-L). They beat Sonderjyske 3-0 at home on Oct 12 and thrashed Skjold 6-1 in the cup on Sep 16. However, their most recent away league match ended in a 2-0 defeat at FC Nordsjaelland on Sep 13. That loss, combined with a 2-2 draw at AC Horsens, suggests some vulnerability on the road.
There is no head-to-head history between Gent and AGF Aarhus. This will be the first competitive meeting between the two sides, so no direct comparisons can be drawn from past encounters.
The UEFA Conference League group stage has not yet begun, so no standings are available. All teams in the group currently have zero points and zero matches played. Therefore, league position offers no insight for this prediction.
After removing the bookmaker margin and adjusting for recent form and home advantage, the win probabilities are:
The calculation starts from the average odds across six bookmakers (home 1.82, draw 2.33, away 4.95). The implied probabilities were then normalized and adjusted upward for Gent due to their perfect home form and overall unbeaten run, while AGF's away loss and draw lowered their chances. Gent are the more likely winners, but the draw remains a significant possibility at 32%.
Bookmakers see Gent as the favorite. The best available odds for a home win range from 1.57 to 1.95, with an average around 1.82. A draw is priced between 2.30 and 2.40, while an away win for AGF Aarhus can be backed at odds from 4.50 to 5.50. These odds reflect Gent's stronger form and home advantage.
Based on the stats, Gent are expected to control the match and create more chances. AGF Aarhus have shown they can score, but their away form is less convincing. The most likely outcome is a Gent victory, but the draw cannot be ruled out. For betting tips, the home win offers value at odds around 1.90, while the draw at 2.30+ could be an interesting alternative given the 32% probability.